Welcome to round 2 of LOA's award-winning (/Josh Lazcano's favorite) gameshow 'Chud or No Chud'!! Based on the amount of responses left in the comments section of the last installment of 'Chud or No Chud', it proved to be one of LOA's most popular posts ever! In fact, the only other post to receive more comments was the one about Sanjaya's sister.
Basically, the point of this game is to try to separate the chuds from the non-chuds. For those of you who need a refresher on what the definition of a true chud is; -a 'chud' is a woman that is of questionable attractiveness, but despite her obvious physical flaws, you'd still be down to bone. The main determinant factor in a woman being a chud is not based on her perceived attractiveness, but rather, how ashamed you'd be to admit it to your friends. In this competition, you have to try to remove the 'famous factor' from the equation and evaluate her physical chudworthiness on it's own merits.(Click image to enlarge)
A few rules for your evaluation:
The chud-spectrum breaks down into 3 general categories: 1.Hot 2.Chud, and 3.Sub-Chud
• The Hot category is a no-brainer. Everyone and their dad would hit it. -Think Rosario Dawson.
• In the Chud category, there's a glimmer of something there. You can't quite put your finger on what it is, but most likely you'd put your dick on what it is...-provided that shit stays on Downlow. -Think Christina Ricci.
• Sub-Chud is pretty self explanatory; It's not happening...-EVER. No way, no how. -Think Kelly Osbourne.
In the Comments section below, please leave your stance on where you think Kate Winslet falls on the chud-spectrum and site reasons for your decision. We will be scientifically compiling this data to come up with the official verdict as to weather or not she is indeed a chud or not. Good luck contestants!!